<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Makes A Bad Bet&#8230;And Doubles Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/obama-makes-a-bad-bet-and-doubles-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/obama-makes-a-bad-bet-and-doubles-down/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Toub, MD, MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/obama-makes-a-bad-bet-and-doubles-down/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>David Toub, MD, MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmpllc.biz/?p=893#comment-27</guid>
		<description>So David, guess you&#039;ll be issuing a retraction given that the CBO has found the proposed legislation would reduce the deficit by $138 billion in its first decade and half of 1 percent of G.D.P., amounting to around $1.2 trillion, in its second decade. So we spend a bit in order to save much more over the long haul, and also insure millions more Americans and make it easier for folks to afford and also be covered by health insurance. In other words, we&#039;ll be joining the rest of civilization. Well, almost. We don&#039;t have a truly universal health care system, but I&#039;ll settle for something rather than the ridiculous status quo.

And yes, this is system reform, not just insurance reform. It doesn&#039;t go as far as many of us would like in terms of true health care reform (eg, single payor), but at least it goes part-way there. Right now, our health care system, for all intents and purposes, is run by third-party payors. They&#039;ve done a terrible job for people, other than their shareholders (they&#039;ve done a great job for them). And I don&#039;t begrudge their bringing value to shareholders-that&#039;s the nature of capitalism. It&#039;s just that capitalism, by its nature, hurts a lot of people in the name of profits. So we need an alternative to the insurance companies. While not perfect, govt-run health care is far better and more efficient than private health insurers. There is far less overhead, for example. There is no focus on shareholder profits, so money left over can be thrown back into the system. It does work-look at the VA and CMS, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So David, guess you&#8217;ll be issuing a retraction given that the CBO has found the proposed legislation would reduce the deficit by $138 billion in its first decade and half of 1 percent of G.D.P., amounting to around $1.2 trillion, in its second decade. So we spend a bit in order to save much more over the long haul, and also insure millions more Americans and make it easier for folks to afford and also be covered by health insurance. In other words, we&#8217;ll be joining the rest of civilization. Well, almost. We don&#8217;t have a truly universal health care system, but I&#8217;ll settle for something rather than the ridiculous status quo.</p>
<p>And yes, this is system reform, not just insurance reform. It doesn&#8217;t go as far as many of us would like in terms of true health care reform (eg, single payor), but at least it goes part-way there. Right now, our health care system, for all intents and purposes, is run by third-party payors. They&#8217;ve done a terrible job for people, other than their shareholders (they&#8217;ve done a great job for them). And I don&#8217;t begrudge their bringing value to shareholders-that&#8217;s the nature of capitalism. It&#8217;s just that capitalism, by its nature, hurts a lot of people in the name of profits. So we need an alternative to the insurance companies. While not perfect, govt-run health care is far better and more efficient than private health insurers. There is far less overhead, for example. There is no focus on shareholder profits, so money left over can be thrown back into the system. It does work-look at the VA and CMS, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/obama-makes-a-bad-bet-and-doubles-down/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmpllc.biz/?p=893#comment-26</guid>
		<description>David -

I think you make great points here.  I would add that the current bill before the HR has very little to do with Healthcare reform and all to do with Insurance Reform, which just so happens to be a great perceived target for the party in power.  True health reform would start with addressing the root causes of our greatest issue: escalating health care costs.  Consumerism is notably missing from the current system and in my view is the greatest cause of cost escalation.  I go into greater detail on this on my blog blog.jacobsononline.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David -</p>
<p>I think you make great points here.  I would add that the current bill before the HR has very little to do with Healthcare reform and all to do with Insurance Reform, which just so happens to be a great perceived target for the party in power.  True health reform would start with addressing the root causes of our greatest issue: escalating health care costs.  Consumerism is notably missing from the current system and in my view is the greatest cause of cost escalation.  I go into greater detail on this on my blog blog.jacobsononline.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/obama-makes-a-bad-bet-and-doubles-down/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmpllc.biz/?p=893#comment-20</guid>
		<description>David,

I agree with the majority if not all of your points and recommendations.  We do need health care reform however this is not reform.  Let&#039;s break this down into incremental improvements that can be understood by the average american instead of these massive 2000+ page bills that have become the norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I agree with the majority if not all of your points and recommendations.  We do need health care reform however this is not reform.  Let&#8217;s break this down into incremental improvements that can be understood by the average american instead of these massive 2000+ page bills that have become the norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.rmpllc.biz @ 2012-02-08 02:37:40 -->
