<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Risk Management Partners &#124; Smart Solutions for Healthcare Today &#187; April 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rmpllc.biz/category/monthly-archives/april-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Milton Friedman and HSAs</title>
		<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/milton-friedman-and-hsas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/milton-friedman-and-hsas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Edman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Purchasing Strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmpllc.biz/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health reform has been passed into law, but what does it mean for the average employer?  Very little has changed for the foreseeable future, and it is essential that employers continue to work on controlling their health benefit costs the same way they did before Obamacare.  We continue to urge careful consideration of the HSA option.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As employers, we need to keep finding more efficient ways to purchase health insurance.  Obamacare will not change much for the average employer, other than to increase your costs.  In the midst of the health reform debate, the Wall Street Journal published an excerpt from an article written by Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman back in 1996.  Friedman, who died in 2006, saw certain aspects of our health care system that led to an article titled &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704784904575111273624979544.html" target="_blank">A Way Out of Soviet-Style Health Care</a>&#8220;, which I would urge all of you to read.</p>
<p>Friedman says that health care can be universal and public&mdash;but “Free, no.”   Doctors and hospitals don’t work for free, it’s just that the patient doesn’t pay them.  “Treatment isn’t free, it’s just depersonalized.  Everywhere there’s a schedule, a quota the doctors have to meet; next!&hellip;And what do patients come for?  For a certificate to be absent from work, for sick leave, for certification for invalids’ pensions (i.e. disability): and the doctor’s job is to catch the frauds.  Doctor and patient as enemies&mdash;is that medicine?”</p>
<p>Friedman’s answer&mdash;give people the option to purchase insurance with a very high deductible, i.e., a policy for medical catastrophes, which would be decidedly cheaper.  The difference can be deposited in a special “medical savings account” that can be drawn on only for medical purposes.  Mr. Friedman was talking about <a href="http://www.rmpllc.biz/resources-2/hsahra-resources/" target="_blank">Health Savings Accounts</a> before we called them HSAs.  It is still the best way for employers to purchase health insurance to obtain the maximum value for your health dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/milton-friedman-and-hsas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fix MEDICARE Now&#8211;Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/fix-medicare-now-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/fix-medicare-now-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Edman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rmpllc.biz/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medicare is a microcosm of the public vs. private debate about what is wrong (and what is right) with our health care system.  Here is more information on how we can fix Medicare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of discussions taking place about the Medicare Program&#8211;what is wrong and what is right.  I&#8217;d like to add my 2 cents, because I believe that in many ways, Medicare is a microcosm of the public vs. private debate about what is wrong (and what is right) with our healthcare system.</p>
<p>Medicare has 4 parts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Part      A, Hospital (started in 1967)</li>
<li>Part      B, Physician and Other (started in 1967)</li>
<li>Part      C, Medicare Advantage (started in 1985 under a different name)</li>
<li>Part      D, Prescription Drugs (started in 2004)</li>
</ul>
<p>When people talk about Medicare, they generally refer to ‘traditional Medicare’—Parts A &amp; B &amp; later D.  This is where the federal government ‘negotiates’ with providers, sets the rates of payment, and cuts the checks.  And, those who can afford it typically purchase a private Medicare supplemental policy to cover those services not paid by Medicare.  KEY POINT: this program is a financial disaster.  This is the program that is costing taxpayers 10X what was originally projected, and is the reason that thankfully the concept of a ‘Public Option’ was turned down as a part of Obamacare.  The government has no track record of success in the health insurance business.</p>
<p>Part C or Medicare Advantage is an effort to deliver Medicare benefits through the private sector.  It is justly being criticized today for payment excesses, but it used to be a VERY successful program.  At the outset, private plans were compensated based on a formula that approximated 95% of what the government would normally pay per capita.  Because of better ‘managed care’ leading to efficiencies, the plans were able to add benefits in order to attract membership.  That is why Medicare Advantage is popular.  SO WHAT HAPPENED?  Under the watchful eye of our elected representatives, capitalism and a lack of transparency allowed this program to be bastardized by the insurance companies (sound familiar Wall Street?).</p>
<p>So, the demise of Medicare Advantage under Obamacare (except for the deals cut in certain states) is misplaced—let’s not throw out the baby with the bath water.  Let’s <a href="../articles/fix-medicare-now-start-with-medicare-advantage/">fix what is wrong with the Medicare program </a>, and go back to the Medicare Advantage basics of the 1980s.  How do we do this?</p>
<ul>
<li>Allow      only PPOs and HMOs to participate in Medicare Advantage</li>
<li>Limit      the number of plan choices to foster competition.</li>
<li>Return      to rates of payment to private plans approximately equal to what the      government would pay under traditional Medicare.</li>
</ul>
<p>Obamacare can be fixed.  Big government control and over reliance on regulation in health care will reduce quality and innovation, and be a financial disaster.  We can do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rmpllc.biz/blog/fix-medicare-now-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.rmpllc.biz @ 2012-02-08 02:31:53 -->
